Skip to main content
What is wrong if I declare main something like this?

const int MYMAX_PARA=10;
int main(int argc, char *(*argv)[MYMAX_PARA], char *env[])
printf("%s %s",(*argv)[1],env[2]);

When I want to pass a double by reference I use 'pointer to double'.
When I want to pass a structure by reference I use 'pointer to structure'.
Then why not 'pointer to array' when passing array by reference?
Why is there and exception in case of arrays?
I try to think why array-to-pointer 'decay' occurs in C/C++,
I think of above example.

To me, the answer is about simplicity of coding. In above
example, argv++ won't give you next argument but rather next
array of arguments. To get next argument you need to do (*argv)[2]
(*argv)[3] and so on. So decay simplifies your coding and avoids
pointer to array syntax.

This rules out char *(*argv)[].

And BTW, third parameter in main is 'recommended' by standard.
Standard demands:
int main() { /* ... */ }
AND
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { /* ... */ }
be allowed.

An excerpt from C++98 standards section 3.6.1 [basic.start.main]
"[Note: it is recommended that any further (optional) parameters be added after argv. ]"

It is upto you to discover what the third para means on your favorite platform.

Comments

Delightful blog. I devote my spare time just
looking for great blogs such as yours. I treasure this
site and will go back!
Jump into my 1800contacts coupon code blog.
Terrific blog. I search the internet everytime I
get a moment to find blogs. Its better than cold iced
tea and I have to visit it one more time!
Jump into my blog.
Powerful blog. The site was incredible and will be
back again! Web surfing helps to find good blogs like
this one.
My 1800contacts coupon codes blog, is something you need to peep out!
Incredible blog. I admired your site and I will be
back once again to view it! I use much of my spare
time searching for blogs like yours.
My 1800contacts coupon codes blog, is something you need to peep out!
lightly-blended said…
Exciting blog. Your site was amazing and will be
back again! I never get tired of looking for blogs
just like this one.
Stop by and look at my 1800contacts coupon blog site.
Creative blog. I just kept looking at it over and
over! Im always looking for blogs like this!
I want you to stop and compare with my blog.
Unbelievable blog. I can hardly wait to vist this
site again.I'm consistently looking up blogs like
this.
Look into my 1800contacts coupon blog.
stunned said…
Energizing blog. It blew me away and I loved your
site. when I have the time to surf the net, i try
finding blogs as good as your site.
Stop by and look at my coupon codes 1800contacts blog site.
Fine blog. I found your site suitable for another
visit! And when I'm able to surf the web, I look for
blogs as great as your work.
It may look like it was hard work, but my plastic surgery boston blog was simple.
Enchanting blog. Your site was off the chain and I
will return! I peep the web for blogs just like this
one.
I can't explain, but you need to check my male plastic surgery blog!
Hype blog. And I admire your site and plan on
returning to it! When I web surf it always helps me to
find great blogs.
Check out my 1800contacts coupon blog, you won't be sorry!
Remarkable blog. I take the neccesary time to find
blogs that are just as good as the ones you do.
Hey why don't you peep my blog site.
manho valentine said…
Enchanting blog. Your site was off the chain and I
will return! I peep the web for blogs just like this
one.
golden slot mobile

Popular posts from this blog

Multi-dimensional arrays in C++11

What new can be said about multi-dimensional arrays in C++? As it turns out, quite a bit! With the advent of C++11, we get new standard library class std::array. We also get new language features, such as template aliases and variadic templates. So I'll talk about interesting ways in which they come together.

It all started with a simple question of how to define a multi-dimensional std::array. It is a great example of deceptively simple things. Are the following the two arrays identical except that one is native and the other one is std::array?

int native[3][4];
std::array<std::array<int, 3>, 4> arr;

No! They are not. In fact, arr is more like an int[4][3]. Note the difference in the array subscripts. The native array is an array of 3 elements where every element is itself an array of 4 integers. 3 rows and 4 columns. If you want a std::array with the same layout, what you really need is:

std::array<std::array<int, 4>, 3> arr;

That's quite annoying for two r…

Inheritance vs std::variant

C++17 added std::variant and std::visit in its repertoire. They are worth a close examination. I've been wondering about whether they are always better than inheritance for modeling sum-types (fancy name for discriminated unions) and if not, under what circumstances they are not. We'll compare the two approaches in this blog post. So here it goes.

Inheritancestd::variantNeed not know all the derived types upfront (open-world assumption)Must know all the cases upfront (closed-world assumption)Dynamic Allocation (usually)No dynamic allocationIntrusive (must inherit from the base class)Non-intrusive (third-party classes can participate)Reference semantics (think how you copy a vector of pointers to base class?)Value semantics (copying is trivial)Algorithm scattered into classesAlgorithm in one placeLanguage supported (Clear errors if pure-virtual is not implemented)Library supported (poor error messages)Creates a first-class abstractionIt’s just a containerKeeps fluent interfaces…

Covariance and Contravariance in C++ Standard Library

Covariance and Contravariance are concepts that come up often as you go deeper into generic programming. While designing a language that supports parametric polymorphism (e.g., templates in C++, generics in Java, C#), the language designer has a choice between Invariance, Covariance, and Contravariance when dealing with generic types. C++'s choice is "invariance". Let's look at an example.
struct Vehicle {}; struct Car : Vehicle {}; std::vector<Vehicle *> vehicles; std::vector<Car *> cars; vehicles = cars; // Does not compile The above program does not compile because C++ templates are invariant. Of course, each time a C++ template is instantiated, the compiler creates a brand new type that uniquely represents that instantiation. Any other type to the same template creates another unique type that has nothing to do with the earlier one. Any two unrelated user-defined types in C++ can't be assigned to each-other by default. You have to provide a c…