Skip to main content

Really short STL notes

My STL notes after reading Effective STL by Scott Meyer. For most of the points below, there are subtle important reasons for that. The reasons are not mentioned here as it would be too long. Please read Effective C++ by Scott Meyer.

1. Use member insert function instead of copy algorithm and inserter.

2. Minimize capacity: string (s).swap (s)
Clear and minimize capacity : string ().swap (s)

3. Associative containers use equivalence (strict weak ordering) and not equality.
Equivalence: !(w1 < w2) && !(w2 > w1)
In strict weak ordering, equal values are not equivalent!
Therefore, Comparison function should return false for equal values when equivalence is expected.

4. Use map::operator [] to modify/retrieve existing elements in the map
Use map::insert to add new elements

5. Iterator can be implicitely converted to reverse_iterator.
reverse_iterator to iterator: use member base() function.
const_cast works for conversion from const_iterator to iterator of strings and vector because they are char* and T* pointers. For others to convert from const_iterator to iterator use std::advance (i, distance (i,ci))

6. istream_iterator is used for formatted input. (does not read spaces)
istreambuf_iterator also reads spaces between strings.

7. v.reserve(size) does not invoke constructor (even default). It simply allocates more memory, if any, to hold size objects. Insertion of value at v.end () is wrong in general, use back_inserter (v) instead. Insertion is important and not assignment even after reserve.

8. v.remove () may not erase elements from the container, therefore, v.size() may not change after v.remove.

9. binary_search should receive same comparison function as the sort function did.

10. Custom function objects should be adaptable. To make them adaptable inherit from unary_function or binary_function. Adaptable function objects can be used with not1.
ptr_fun, mem_fun and mem_fun_ref are used to adapt member functions for algorithms like for_each.


Popular Content

Multi-dimensional arrays in C++11

What new can be said about multi-dimensional arrays in C++? As it turns out, quite a bit! With the advent of C++11, we get new standard library class std::array. We also get new language features, such as template aliases and variadic templates. So I'll talk about interesting ways in which they come together. It all started with a simple question of how to define a multi-dimensional std::array. It is a great example of deceptively simple things. Are the following the two arrays identical except that one is native and the other one is std::array? int native[3][4]; std::array<std::array<int, 3>, 4> arr; No! They are not. In fact, arr is more like an int[4][3]. Note the difference in the array subscripts. The native array is an array of 3 elements where every element is itself an array of 4 integers. 3 rows and 4 columns. If you want a std::array with the same layout, what you really need is: std::array<std::array<int, 4>, 3> arr; That's quite annoying for

Unit Testing C++ Templates and Mock Injection Using Traits

Unit testing your template code comes up from time to time. (You test your templates, right?) Some templates are easy to test. No others. Sometimes it's not clear how to about injecting mock code into the template code that's under test. I've seen several reasons why code injection becomes challenging. Here I've outlined some examples below with roughly increasing code injection difficulty. Template accepts a type argument and an object of the same type by reference in constructor Template accepts a type argument. Makes a copy of the constructor argument or simply does not take one Template accepts a type argument and instantiates multiple interrelated templates without virtual functions Lets start with the easy ones. Template accepts a type argument and an object of the same type by reference in constructor This one appears straight-forward because the unit test simply instantiates the template under test with a mock type. Some assertion might be tested in

Want speed? Use constexpr meta-programming!

It's official: C++11 has two meta-programming languages embedded in it! One is based on templates and other one using constexpr . Templates have been extensively used for meta-programming in C++03. C++11 now gives you one more option of writing compile-time meta-programs using constexpr . The capabilities differ, however. The meta-programming language that uses templates was discovered accidently and since then countless techniques have been developed. It is a pure functional language which allows you to manipulate compile-time integral literals and types but not floating point literals. Most people find the syntax of template meta-programming quite abominable because meta-functions must be implemented as structures and nested typedefs. Compile-time performance is also a pain point for this language feature. The generalized constant expressions (constexpr for short) feature allows C++11 compiler to peek into the implementation of a function (even classes) and perform optimization